M.W.P.Strandberg's Home
Page: Top
...
Next: Bibliography
Up: De Generibus Diversis: Pisum
Previous: A Tour of the
It is clear to me that, given the care of the selection of the subject of his
research, and the careful statistical protocols he used for guidance,
Mendel qualifies to be wrested away from the biologists, or botanists, or
naturalists, and respected as a model physicist. He was applying a
tool, probability theory, brand new to physics, and he chose a medium,
peas, about which he had deep practical knowledge. The successes in physics
are described in those terms. The experiments carried out working with the
wrong medium, we promptly forget. The ones that have chosen the proper
medium, we hail as intuitively self evident, and honor with prizes. The
novelty of probability theory is evident from the concerns that Naegele
has with Mendel's results. If the expectation is a 3 to 1 ratio, why does
Mendel not find 3.00, but 3.?? or 2.?? in his experiments, he asks. Let's
give Mendel the credit he deserves, not the carping about possible flaws
-- all ground breaking experiments have them!
M.W.P.Strandberg's Home
Page: Top
...
Malcom W. P. Strandberg
2000-07-13